Understanding the Implementation of Pre-Primary Education in India

The National Education Policy 2020, completes two years this year. Among its areas of focus has been the introduction of pre-primary education, also referred to as early childhood education across the country, for a young child’s holistic development. Pre-primary education is meant for children under the age of 6 years. As a child’s brain develops the fastest between 0-5 years, pre-primary education works as a catalyst in developing cognitive, emotional, and basic literacy and numeracy skills [1], thereby preparing students to move to formal schooling and later stages of education [2]. But implementation challenges on the ground persist.   

Pre-primary education in India was formally included in the purview of the country’s education policy fairly recently when, in 2018-19, provisions were made to allocate funds for this purpose with the launch of the Samagra Shiksha scheme. Since then, even though several states started introducing pre-primary classes, the extent to which it was offered varied widely.

Prior to this, the Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) Policy, 2013 talked about achieving “…holistic development and active learning capacity of all children below six years of age” [3]. The ECCE has been implemented through the country’s Anganwadi Centre (AWC) system. However, pre-school education has been a small component of the services offered by an Anganwadi, whose key focus is nutrition and immunisation services.

The idea of universalisation of pre-primary education in India was yet to get a country-wide policy push, till the NEP, 2020 was released. It emphasised pre-primary education as an integral part of India’s public school education system. 

Implementation of Pre-Primary Education till now

Post NEP, 2020, in order to facilitate state governments to implement pre-primary education recommendations of the policy in government schools, the Ministry of Education (MoE) released a plan in April 2021 called Student’s and Teacher’s Holistic Advancement through Quality Education (SARTHAQ) [4]. SARTHAQ outlines the implementation tasks, stakeholders responsible, targeted outputs, and dedicated timelines for the tasks to be achieved. 

As mentioned previously, India has relied on its extensive Anganwadi system to implement ECCE, which also caters to children in the 3 to 6 years age bracket, alongside younger children, women and adolescent girls. Some policy questions emerged: 

  • Since pre-primary education also aims to provide services to children in similar age-groups such as those going to Anganwadis, should classrooms for the pre-primary section be constructed in all government schools or should AWCs be given this responsibility? In such a case, will an AWC be well-equipped to implement pre-primary education? Should the Anganwadi worker be trained to teach them the new pre-primary syllabus? 
  • In case pre-primary classrooms are introduced in government primary schools, since the children in this age-group should ideally get the nutritional services provided through the AWC system, how can this be ensured for the pre-primary section? 

On the ground, these questions relate to three types of scenarios: (a) A government primary school without a pre-primary section, but which has an AWC inside or outside the school premises; (b) Primary school with an AWC inside the premises and also having pre-primary grade; and (c) Primary school with pre-primary grade, but without an AWC. This is why the need for role clarity between a school and an AWC and the extent of coordination between the two systems, is crucial.

Our conversations with government education officials across five states (Bihar, Maharashtra, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan) during October 2021 and March 2022 revealed that there was a lot of confusion initially regarding the on-ground implementation process. This confusion was primarily linked to the ambiguity related to the structure of provisioning of pre-primary education and the sources of funding. 

Funding for pre-primary education and structure of implementation

To implement ECCE through the AWC system, funds are channelled through the erstwhile Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme (which is currently part of the newly structured Saksham Anganwadi and POSHAN 2.0). On the other hand, pre-primary education is funded by the school education department primarily through the Samagra Shiksha scheme and recently through the Strengthening Teaching-Learning and Results for States (STARS) project in some states. 

However, there appears to be confusion in the states regarding who should be funding what aspects of pre-primary education when AWCs and pre-primary schools actually co-exist on the ground.

For instance, implementation decisions could include whether mid-day meals (MDM) for the pre-primary students should be funded through the MDM scheme or it can be substituted by hot-cooked meals provided in AWCs when they are situated inside school premises. Similarly, who should be funding training of Anganwadi workers if they are supposed to implement pre-primary syllabus? Again, for schools that have pre-primary classes, should a new cohort of teachers trained in pre-primary, should they be appointed or should the Anganwadi worker provide some support? When an Angawadi is situated inside school premises, should there be any role the Anganwadi worker plays in pre-primary education in case the school also has pre-primary classrooms?

In Himachal Pradesh, for example, the AWCs and pre-primary schools are functioning as two different entities with minimal interaction. This creates a point of concern as a large number of villages or localities do not have schools with pre-primary grades. Hence, the challenge remains whether children in AWCs will be able to attain the same level of preparedness as compared to other children studying in a pre-primary school before entering Grade 1. 

Rajasthan, on the other hand, has been able to achieve some kind of convergence between the two departments — education and WCD. Not only are Anganwadi workers being trained by the Education Department on the pre-primary syllabus, but they are also being assigned a primary school teacher, called a ‘mentor’ teacher, to support them in teaching pre-primary syllabus to children in the Anganwadi. Apart from Samagra Shiksha, Rajasthan has been using part of STARS funds for training new teachers, training of AWWs, teaching-learning material kits, and creating teaching modules for teachers [5]

Punjab, unlike Rajasthan, has built pre-primary classes in all primary schools by now. In places where the AWCs are located inside the school premises, the same students are enrolled in the AWC as well as the pre-primary class. This double enrollment helps the students avail the benefits of both schemes linked to nutritional services and pre-primary education. 

Whether it is about creating pre-primary infrastructure in primary schools or the utilisation of Anganwadi structure, a substantial amount of initial investment is required to ensure pre-primary education to each child as envisaged by the NEP, 2020. At the same time, the implementation challenges highlighted above need to be resolved at the state level through continued consultation. While some states have made progress in this direction, many others are still in the process of figuring this out. 


Mridusmita Bordoloi is an Associate Fellow and Anwesha Mallick is a Research Assistant at Accountability Initiative.

Editorial inputs by Avantika Shrivastava. 


Also Read: India’s Public Investment in Education: Deciphering the Inconsistencies in Official Statistics


References: 

[1] Report “Starting Strong 2017” (OECD, 2017)

[2] Report “Starting well: Benchmarking early education across the world” (EIU, 2012)

[3] Policy Document “ New Education Policy 2020” (MoHRD, 2020)

[4] Policy Document “SARTHAQ” (MOE, 2021)

[5] Information reproduced from ECCE: STARS (FY: 2021-22), budget sheet for Rajasthan

पॉलिसी बझ

हे पॉलिसी बझ तुम्हाला विविध कल्याणकारी योजनांमध्ये काय चालले आहे याविषयी दर 15 दिवसांनी विशेष बातम्या अपडेट करते.

धोरण बातम्या 

  1. अकरावी कृषी जनगणना कृषी आणि शेतकरी कल्याण मंत्रालयाने सुरू केली.
  2. कामगार मंत्रालयाकडे बालमजुरीबाबत कोणतीही नोंद नाही, असा अहवाल कामगार विषयक संसदेच्या स्थायी समितीने दिला आहे. 2016 मध्ये संपूर्ण शिक्षा अभियानासोबत राष्ट्रीय बालकामगार प्रकल्प (NCLP) एकत्र केल्यामुळे डेटाचा अभाव आहे.
  3. किमान आधारभूत किंमत (MSP) अधिक प्रभावी आणि पारदर्शक करण्यासाठी, कृषी आणि शेतकरी कल्याण मंत्रालयाच्या अधिसूचनेनुसार 29 सदस्यीय पॅनेल तयार करण्यात आले आहे.
  4. देशातील मेट्रो रेल्वे नेटवर्कसाठी एकल आणि सर्वसमावेशक कायद्याची गरज आहे, अशी शिफारस गृहनिर्माण आणि नागरी व्यवहारांवरील संसदीय स्थायी समितीने केली आहे.
  5. देशातील 4G मोबाई सर्विस नसलेल्या गावां मध्ये 4G सेवेच्या संपृक्ततेच्या प्रकल्पाला केंद्रीय मंत्रिमंडळाने मंजुरी दिली.
  6. मिशन शक्ती आणि मिशन वात्सल्य साठी मार्गदर्शक तत्वे महिला आणि बाल विकास मंत्रालयाने जारी केली आहेत.
  7. राज्य सरकारने मेघालयातील जनगणना शहरांमध्ये MGNREGS लाँच केले आहे. 
  8. केंद्रीकृत सार्वजनिक तक्रार निवारण आणि देखरेख प्रणाली (CPGRAMS) सर्व अनुसूचित भाषांमध्ये कार्यान्वित करण्यासाठी विस्तारित करण्यात आली आहे जेणेकरून सर्व क्षेत्रांमध्ये त्याची पोहोच वाढेल.
  9. निति आयोगाने इंडिया इनोव्हेशन इंडेक्सची तिसरी आवृत्ती लॉन्च केली आहे.
  10. केंद्रीय मंत्रिमंडळाने राज्यांच्या बजेट बाहेरील कर्जे समायोजित करण्यासाठी नियम शिथिल केले आहेत.
  11. आंतरराष्ट्रीय पुरवठा साखळी बळकट करण्यासाठी भारताने युनायटेड स्टेट्स ऑफ अमेरिकाने जागतिक पुरवठा साखळींच्या सहकार्यावर संयुक्त निवेदन स्वीकारले आहे.
  12. आदिवासी तरुणांना ग्राम अभियंता म्हणून प्रशिक्षण पूर्ण केल्याबद्दल प्रमाणपत्र मिळाले आहे.

आरोग्य आणि पोषण

  1. राष्ट्रीय अन्न सुरक्षा कायदा (NFSA) साठी राज्य क्रमवारी निर्देशांकाची पहिली आवृत्ती अन्न प्रक्रिया उद्योग मंत्रालयाने प्रसिद्ध केली आहे. 
  2. आयुष्मान भारत डिजिटल मिशन (ABDM) सह बावन्न डिजिटल हेल्थ ऍप्लिकेशन्स यशस्वीरित्या एकत्रित करण्यात आले आहेत.
  3. द स्टेट ऑफ फूड सिक्युरिटी अँड न्यूट्रिशन इन वर्ल्ड (SOFI) च्या नुकत्याच प्रकाशित झालेल्या 2022 च्या आवृत्तीनुसार, 2021 मध्ये तब्बल 828 दशलक्ष लोक उपासमारीने प्रभावित झाले होते.
  4. आरोग्य आणि कुटुंब कल्याण मंत्रालयाने नवीन औषधे, वैद्यकीय उपकरणे आणि सौंदर्य प्रसाधने विधेयक 2022 चा मसुदा जारी केला आहे.
  5. WHO आणि UNICEF च्या मते 25 दशलक्ष अर्भकांना जीवनरक्षक लसी दिली जात नसल्यामुळे,  2021 मध्ये जगभरातील लसीकरण कव्हरेज घटत राहिले आहे.

शिक्षण

  1. राष्ट्रीय शैक्षणिक धोरण (NEP) 2020 च्या 2 वर्षपूर्ती निमित्त केंद्र सरकारकडून अनेक शैक्षणिक उपक्रम सुरू करण्यात आले, ज्यात पुढील गोष्टींचा समावेश आहे:
    • भारतीय ज्ञान प्रणालीची स्थापना – उत्पादन नवोपक्रमासाठी पारंपारिक ज्ञान प्रणालींना प्रोत्साहन देण्यासाठी शिक्षण मंत्रालय (IKS-MEI) केली आहे.
    • स्थानिक कला आणि वारसा यांना प्रोत्साहन देण्यासाठी 750 शाळांमध्ये कलाशाळा उपक्रम सुरू केले आहेत.
    • विज्ञान आणि गणितातील 750 आभासी प्रयोगशाळा आणि 75 कौशल्य ई-लॅबची स्थापना.
    • विद्या अमृत पोर्टलची निर्मिती, शालेय शिक्षणात होत असलेल्या सूक्ष्म-सुधारणा वाढवण्यासाठी एक डिजिटल प्रकल्प आहे.
    • नॅशनल इनिशिएटिव्ह फॉर स्कूल हेड्स अँड टीचर्स होलिस्टिक अॅडव्हान्समेंट (NISHTHA) कार्यक्रमाद्वारे अंगणवाड्यांमध्ये उच्च दर्जाचे अर्ली चाइल्डहुड केअर अँड एज्युकेशन (ECCE) शिक्षकांचे प्राथमिक संवर्ग तयार होत आहे.
    • कल्पना, नवोपक्रम आणि उद्योजकता (IIE) च्या संस्कृतीला चालना देण्यासाठी शालेय नवोपक्रम धोरणाची अंमलबजावणी.
  2. शिक्षण मंत्रालयाने पोस्ट नॅशनल अचिव्हमेंट सर्व्हे (NAS) वर राष्ट्रीय कार्यशाळा आयोजित केली होती.
  3. ‘शिक्षण मानके, मान्यता प्रक्रिया, संशोधन, परीक्षा सुधारणा, खाजगी विद्यापीठे/इतर उच्च शिक्षण संस्थांमधील शिक्षण, महिला, मुले, युवक आणि क्रीडा यांच्या विभागाशी संबंधित शैक्षणिक वातावरणाचा तीनशे चाळीस पहिला अहवाल’ या शीर्षकाचा अहवाल संसदीय स्थायी समितीने सादर केला. हा अहवाल उच्च शिक्षणातील सुधारणांसाठी अनेक शिफारसी करतो. येथे संपूर्ण अहवाल वाचा.

इतर बातम्या

  1. राष्ट्रीय सांख्यिकी कार्यालय (NSO) ने त्यांच्या लिंग निर्देशकांच्या किमान संचाच्या श्रम निर्देशकांच्या संकलनावर कार्यरत पेपर मध्ये नमूद केले आहे की अर्धवेळ काम करणाऱ्या महिलांचे प्रमाण सर्व वयोगटातील पुरुषां पेक्षा जास्त आहे.
  2. न्यायमूर्ती रोहिणी आयोग, ज्याला ओबीसींच्या उप-वर्गीकरणाची जबाबदारी देण्यात आली होती, त्याला केंद्रीय मंत्रिमंडळाने 13 वी मुदतवाढ दिली आहे. 
  3. ‘युथ इन इंडिया 2022’ अहवाल सांख्यिकी आणि कार्यक्रम अंमलबजावणी मंत्रालयाने जारी केला आहे. ते इथे वाचा.
  4. निति आयोगाने जारी केलेला डिजिटल बँकांवरील अहवाल.
  5. स्वच्छ, निरोगी आणि शाश्वत वातावरणात प्रवेश हा यूएन जनरल असेंब्लीने सार्वत्रिक मानवी हक्क म्हणून घोषित केला आहे.
  6. ग्लोबल फाइंडेक्स 2021 डेटाबेस: फायनान्शियल इन्क्लुजन, डिजिटल पेमेंट्स आणि कोविड-19 च्या युगातील लवचिकता अहवाल जागतिक बँक समूहाने प्रकाशित केला आहे.
  7. सस्टेनेबल डेव्हलपमेंट गोल्स रिपोर्ट 2022 संयुक्त राष्ट्रांनी प्रसिद्ध केला आहे. ते इथे वाचा.
  8. ग्लोबल जेंडर गॅप रिपोर्ट 2022 वर्ल्ड इकॉनॉमिक फोरमने जारी केला आहे.
  9. युनायटेड नेशन्स डिपार्टमेंट ऑफ इकॉनॉमिक अँड सोशल अफेयर्स (UNDESA) द्वारे वर्ल्ड पॉप्युलेशन प्रॉस्पेक्ट्स 2022 प्रसिद्ध करण्यात आले. ते इथे वाचा.
  10. हवामान बदलाच्या पार्श्वभूमीवर मुलांचे संरक्षण करण्यासाठी प्रथम जागतिक धोरण आराखडा, ‘हवामान बदलाच्या संदर्भात मुलांसाठी मार्गदर्शक तत्त्वे’ संयुक्त राष्ट्रांनी प्रसिद्ध केले.

हा लेख पॉलिसी बझच्या इंग्रजी आवृत्तीवर आधारित आहे जो 1 अगस्त 2022 रोजी प्रकाशित झाला.

Policy Buzz

Keep up-to-date with all that is happening in welfare policy with this curated selection of news – Policy Buzz – published every fortnight.

Policy News

  1. The Eleventh Agriculture Census was launched by the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 
  2. There are no records on child labour with Ministry of Labour, reported the Parliament Standing Committee on Labour. The lack of data is a result of assimilation of National Child Labour Project (NCLP) with the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan in 2016. 
  3. To make Minimum Support Price (MSP) more effective and transparent, a 29-member panel has been constituted as per notification by the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. 
  4. There is a need for single and comprehensive legislation for Metro rail networks in the country, recommended the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs. 
  5. A project for saturation of 4G mobile services in the country’s uncovered villages was approved by the Union Cabinet.
  6. Guidelines for Mission Shakti and Mission Vatsalya were released by the Ministry of Women and Child Development. 
  7. MGNREGS was launched in the Census towns of Meghalaya by the state government. 
  8. Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS) was expanded to be operational in all Scheduled Languages to increase its outreach to all regions.
  9. The third edition of the India Innovation Index was launched by the NITI Aayog. 
  10. Norms for adjusting states’ off-budget borrowings were eased by the Union Cabinet.
  11. A joint statement on cooperation of global supply chains by the United States of America was adopted by India to strengthen international supply chains.

Health & Nutrition 

  1. The first edition of the State Ranking Index for National Food Security Act (NFSA) was released by the Ministry of Food Processing Industries. 
  2. Fifty-two digital health applications have been successfully integrated with Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM).
  3. As many as 828 million people were affected by hunger in 2021, according to the recently published 2022 edition of The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World (SOFI). 
  4. Draft New Drugs, Medical Devices and Cosmetics Bill 2022 was released by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
  5. With 25 million infants not being administered life saving vaccines, vaccination coverage across the globe continued to decline in 2021 according to WHO and UNICEF.

Education 

  1. Several education initiatives were launched by the Union Government on the 2 year anniversary of National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, including: 
    • Establishment of Indian Knowledge System – Ministry of Education Innovation (IKS-MEI) Cell for promoting traditional knowledge systems for product innovation. 
    • Launch of Kalashala initiative in 750 schools to promote and support local arts and heritage. 
    • Setting-up of  750 virtual labs in science and mathematics and 75 skilling e-labs. 
    • Creation of Vidya Amrit portal, a digital project to scale up the micro-improvements taking place in the school education.
    • Preparation of an initial cadre of high-quality Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) Teachers in Anganwadis through National Initiative for School Heads and Teachers Holistic Advancement (NISHTHA) program.
    • Implementation of School Innovation Policy to foster the culture of Ideation, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (IIE).
    • Conducting a Public Consultation survey for National Curriculum Framework in 23 languages.
  2. The National Workshop on Post National Achievement Survey (NAS) was organised by the Ministry of Education.
  3. Report titled ‘Three Hundred And Forty First Report On Review Of Education Standards, Accreditation Process, Research, Examination Reforms And Academic Environment In Deemed/ Private Universities/Other Higher Education Institutions’ was presented by the Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports. The report makes several recommendations for reforms in higher education. Read the complete report here.

Other News

  1. The proportion of females working part time is more than males in all age-groups, noted National Statistical Office (NSO) in its Working Paper on Compilation of Labour Indicators of Minimum Set of Gender Indicators.
  2. The Justice Rohini Commission, tasked with sub-categorisation of the OBCs, was given 13th extension by the Union Cabinet. 
  3. ‘Youth in India 2022’ report was released by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Read it here
  4. Report on Digital Banks released by the NITI Aayog. 
  5. Access to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment declared as a universal human right by the UN General Assembly. 
  6. The Global Findex 2021 Database: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19 report was published by World Bank Group. 
  7. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 was released by the United Nations. Read it here.  
  8. Global Gender Gap Report 2022 was released by the World Economic Forum. 
  9. World Population Prospects 2022 was released by the United Nations Department Of Economic And Social Affairs (UNDESA). Read it here.
  10. First global policy framework on protecting children on the move in face of climate change, ‘The Guiding Principles for Children on the Move in the Context of Climate Change’ released by the United Nations.

Also Read: In a Glance: Monsoon Session 2022 (Part I)

‘Now and in the Future, Skill Set of Policy Making & Implementation Using Evidence-based Framework is Needed’

The bureaucracy is considered to be the steel framework that makes the country’s development aspirations a reality, but little is understood in the public about the people behind the scenes. State Speak is an exclusive interview series by the Accountability Initiative featuring insights from IAS officers posted in India’s districts and other public officials who have a vantage point on how the country is being governed, related challenges and best practices.

In this interview, we spoke with Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla who serves as a Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate in East Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh. He is an IAS officer from the AGMUT cadre of the 2017 batch. East Kameng is situated along India’s border with China.

Q. You are the highest-ranking administration officer in your district. You administer difficult and remote terrain. What are the challenges that you and your team face on a daily basis?

Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla: East Kameng is one of the backward regions of Arunachal Pradesh. One of the key reasons is the infrastructure. For example, as recent as 2020, the district did not even have 4G connectivity; most of the villages outside the district headquarters did not have any basic mobile connectivity. Even today, our existing road and power connectivity is quite vulnerable to disruptions caused by monsoons. So, now the question arises, what are the challenges in terms of administration when it comes to a place like this?

The key challenge is, ensuring access to public services in the remotest corners of the district. We are trying to overcome the challenges both through improvements in infrastructure as well as reaching out to the public. For example, we have this programme called Sarkaar Aap Ke Dwar, wherein we take almost all the Line Departments and do camps in remote villages of the district to ensure that the public services are brought to the doorstep of the citizens.

Secondly, we are also focussing on improving our infrastructure. Road connectivity significantly improved in the last five years. While some areas are still having connectivity issues, most of the district is now connected with all-weather roads. In the last two years, mobile connectivity improved significantly and around 60-70 per cent of the habitations have access to good mobile and internet connectivity.

A central government scheme for strengthening power lines is ongoing. Once it is done, I think all basic requirements like roads, mobile connectivity, and power connectivity will be in place. And I think that will remove certain bottlenecks in terms of public service delivery to the remotest areas.

Q. What has it been like during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla: Because of the infrastructure bottlenecks already mentioned, it was very difficult to impose lockdown and monitor it across the entire district. We have a small population of around 80,000 people, but villages are scattered across an area of more than 4,000 square kilometres. Therefore, reaching out to those villages was an extremely difficult task.

Ensuring COVID-19 vaccinations in such remote locations was a herculean task. In some cases, our staff carried vaccine loads on their heads through difficult terrain and reached remote villages to administer the COVID-19 vaccines. After all those efforts if people do not take up vaccines due to hesitancy, then it is not just a wastage of human effort but also wastage of precious vaccines doses.

We needed to make meticulous communication strategies to ensure that superstitions, blind beliefs, religious beliefs etc., are all addressed and public are mobilised for vaccine outreach sessions.

Also, while the pandemic affected almost every aspect of our life, education took a bad hit. The concept of online education did not work here due to a lack of internet facilities. Though we had offline modes of learning, the learning losses were significant. However, we are making all efforts to bridge those gaps.

Q. You have often spoken about community-level, ground-up development to achieve welfare objectives, particularly linked with women empowerment and making sure they are literate. You have also stressed on the need for adult literacy of women, and that they be economically active. Are there specific instances that led to this vision of yours?

Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla: I think that idea came from my field experience. Whenever I visited villages, I used to have very informal discussions with the people, because obviously, being a Deputy Commissioner (DC), they would see me from a position of authority. It is very difficult for people to open and really share what their personal views — how they see life, what their aspirations are, and what they expect from the administration.

My background in Anthropology (UPSC Optional) helped me in removing those hurdles and make proper conversations. I realised that there is huge gender imbalance at the field-level, though it is generally said that gender imbalance is relatively less in tribal societies. Men get to take all the decisions at the family-level, money is also under the control of the men. And through the experience of DAY-NRLM, I noticed that women have lot of determination to do something for their empowerment.

The other field experience was about my district’s agriculture potential. Most of the agriculture products come from outside the district, even basic things like potatoes, tomatoes, and eggs, despite have adequate resources for agriculture development in this region. I wondered why there was this demand-supply mismatch.

So that’s when I came up with an idea to orient women from Self Help Groups (SHGs) towards agriculture development of the district. To implement that idea, we converged nearly nine central and state government schemes, and created an Empowered Committee with five Line Departments at the district-level.

At the farm-level, we provided subsidies, farm machineries, efficient irrigation systems, along with extension services.  At the SHG level we formed a cooperative society of more than 3,000 women which became the link between farmers and consumers. Using local funds, we created a community warehouse, a 40 metric ton cold storage and a dedicated local market.

A dedicated market ensured that competition was introduced into the market which was hitherto monopolised by a few middlemen who brought in all the supplies from neighbouring states. This market enabled several farmers to get good returns on their investments. And we saw agriculture produce coming from some of the most interior locations of the district!

This picked up quite well and the SHG women realised that they have a lot of potential to make a difference in their lives and their communities. They are motivated to work hard even with very small investments. Over time I realised that their pursuit is not merely financial independence but a sense of individual purpose and meaning in their lives.

Q. What is the relevance of e-governance for a district such as East Kameng?

Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla: Given the kind of network challenges that we have, it is difficult for us to deploy e-government solutions. With some improvements in the network availability in the recent past, we are experimenting with e-Governance solutions in the district headquarter region.

To begin with, we are making all out efforts to implement e-office in all district level offices to remove inefficiencies and time delays in physical movements of files. This is in line with the commitment of the Government of Arunachal Pradesh to make 2022 the ‘Year of e-Governance’.

The second step is to gradually introduce digital services at the government-citizen interface. We are currently implementing an ‘Ease of Doing Business Portal’ where trading licenses can be applied online. In all rural development schemes, like the MGNREGS, we are using mobile-based monitoring wherever network is permitting us to do so.

So, wherever technology is feasible for us, we are trying to experiment with the solutions, learn from the field and try and scale it up in a very gradual manner. This is because, as much as technology can ease the burden for us, I think one should look at it from the perspective of the citizens. I don’t think you should measure e-governance solutions in terms of how easy it is making life for the administration. Rather it should be measured on the basis of how easy it is making life for the citizens.

Q. India is celebrating the 75th year of independence. As per you, what will be the role of the IAS cadre going forward?

Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla: Historically, the institution of IAS was created was for maintaining law and order and collecting land revenue. After independence, the delivery of public services and enabling development has become the main agenda. I think, going forward, that will continue to be the main mandate or the scope of work for IAS officers; to make sure that whatever development programmes are there, they get effectively implemented at the grassroots-level.

Over the past seven decades, so many departments have mushroomed. For example, in our district, we have close to 40 departments working parallelly to implement different types of schemes or regulate different areas at the field-level. So, I think the most important skill set that IAS officers should have is leadership skills, to become that point of convergence for all these Line Departments, and to drive developmental initiatives in a very effective way at the field-level.

Secondly, the skill set of using evidence for policy-making and implementation is something that the IAS officers will be requiring in the future.

Implementation of development programmes, leadership, and an inclination to rely on evidence and take right decisions is very important.

Q. According to you, what are the governance challenges that India will be looking at in the coming 10 years?

Pravimal Abhishek Polumatla: Addressing inequalities in access to education, healthcare, regional imbalances in economic development, improving the land administration, ensuring ease of doing business, effective management of data for good governance and last but not least, building capacities to respond to climate change.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

The opinions expressed are personal and do not represent an institutional stand.

Transcription by Prateek Gupta.

Also read: We Need to Listen to the Communities We Work With: Interview with IAS Dr. Mittali Sethi 

जवाबदेही कानून जैसी व्यवस्थाओं की आवश्यकता

यह पाया गया है की एक स्वस्थ शासन के लिए नागरिकों की भागीदारी काफी महत्वपूर्ण होती है। अगर शासन में नागरिक भागीदारी की बात करें तो उसके लिए सामाजिक जवाबदेही दृष्टिकोण प्रचलित है जो कि शासन में नागरिकों की अलग-अलग तरह से भागीदारी पर ज़ोर देता है। भारत में सामाजिक जवाबदेही के स्वरुप में समय के साथ बदलाव भी देखने को मिला है, जैसे शुरूआत में नागरिकों को वोट के माध्यम से सरकार को चुनने का अधिकार मिला और धीरे-धीरे जन-सुनवाई, सामाजिक अंकेषण एवं सूचना का अधिकार जैसे माध्यमों से भागीदारी बढ़ी। इस बदलाव की प्रमुख वजह नागरिकों का सशक्त होना है।  

इसी क्रम में राजस्थान में 2011 से सुचना एवं रोजगार अभियान, राजस्थान बैनर तले विभिन्न स्वयंसेवी संगठनों, बुद्धिजीवियों, कलाकारों, नागरिकों एवं मिडिया संगठनों के माध्यम से ‘जवाबदेही कानून’ को लेकर मांग उठाई जा रही है। 

इस अभियान के तहत प्रमुख मांगें हैं कि शिकायत की अपील के लिए स्वतंत्र मंच का निर्माण हो, नागरिकों को शिकायत निवारण प्रक्रिया में भाग लेने का अधिकार हो, शिकायत निवारण हेतु एक तय समय-सीमा हो, नागरिकों के प्रति सरकारी अधिकारीयों की जवाबदेही निर्धारित हो एवं नागरिकों को शिकायत दर्ज करने का अधिकार हो।  

दिसम्बर 2015 में सूचना एवं रोज़गार अधिकार अभियान (एस.आर.अभियान), राजस्थान इस मांग को लेकर राजस्थान के 33 जिलों में ‘जवाबदेही यात्रा’ के माध्यम से पहुंचा। इस यात्रा का लक्ष्य अधिक से अधिक लोगों तक कानून का सन्देश देने के साथ ज़मीनी स्तर पर मौजूद शिकायतों की पहचान कर इक्कठा करना भी था। यह यात्रा करीब 101 दिनों तक चली। सभी जिलों से लगभग 10 हजार शिकायतें मिली जिनको राजस्थान सम्पर्क पोर्टल पर एस.आर.अभियान द्वारा रजिस्टर किया गया। 

यात्रा के तहत अलग-अलग क्षेत्रों से जुड़ी समस्याएँ प्राप्त हुईं, जैसे किसी को पेंशन नहीं मिल रही थी तो किसी को राशन नहीं मिल रहा था, किसी की मनरेगा से सम्बंधित समस्या थी और कहीं लोगों के पास आवास की समस्या थी। 

जवाबदेही यात्रा के अलावा एस.आर.अभियान ने निरंतर धरना-प्रदर्शन से भी अपनी मांग रखी, हालांकि  राज्य सरकार ने इस पर कोई ठोस कदम नहीं लिया । 2018 के विधानसभा चुनावों में जवाबदेही कानून एक प्रमुख मुद्दा बना और वर्तमान सत्ताधारी पार्टी ने अपने घोषणा पत्र में इसे शामिल करते हुए इसे लागू करने का वादा किया। जवाबदेही कानून लाने के लिए राज्य सरकार ने 2019 के बजट में भी घोषणा की | ‘जवाबदेही कानून’ के मसौदे को तैयार करने के लिए रिटायर्ड आईएएस ऑफिसर राम लुभया के नेतृत्व में एक कमेठी का गठन किया गया | फ़रवरी 2020 में कमेठी ने अपनी रिपोर्ट एवं कानून का मसौदा सत्तारुढ सरकार को सौंप दिया | लेकिन इसके बाद सरकार ने रिपोर्ट पर कोई कदम नहीं उठाया।  

दिसम्बर 2021 में एस.आर.अभियान मंच ने दुबारा यह तय किया कि ‘जवाबदेही यात्रा’ को फिर से शुरू किया जाए। 22 दिसम्बर 2021 को दूसरी ‘जवाबदेही यात्रा’ का सञ्चालन किया गया लेकिन कोविड के चलते 6 जनवरी 2022 को इसे स्थगित करना पड़ा। एस.आर.अभियान द्वारा अभी इस मुहीम को ऑनलाइन माध्यमों के द्वारा संचालित किया जा रहा है। 

वैसे तो राजस्थान में जनसुनवाई अधिकार अधिनियम 2012 बनाया गया है जिससे आम जनता को उसके निवास स्थान के नज़दीक सुनवाई का अवसर प्रदान करने की व्यवस्था की गई है। इस अधिनियम के तहत जन शिकायत या परिवाद पर 15 दिवस में सुनवाई की अनिवार्यता है तथा साथ ही शिकायत/परिवाद पर लिये गये निर्णय की संसुचना 7 दिवस में देने की अनिवार्यता भी सुनिश्चित की गई है। इसमें अधिकारियों/कर्मचारियों के दोषी पाए जाने पर 500 से 5000 हजार रूपये तक दंड का प्रावधान भी रखा गया है लेकिन यह वास्तव में ज़मीनी स्तर पर उतना प्रभावी नहीं है। 

जवाबदेही यात्रा के माध्यम से देखने को मिला की आज भी सार्वजनिक सेवाओं को लेकर लोगों की काफी सारी शिकायतें रहती हैं, जिनका समाधान उन्हें समय पर नहीं मिल पाता। लोग, सरकारी दफ्तरों में अपनी शिकायतों को लेकर तो जाते हैं, लेकिन वहां कभी उन्हें नियमों का हवाला दिया जाता है तो कभी किसी अन्य अधिकारी/विभाग के पास जाने को कहा जाता है। यही नहीं, अगर शिकायतें ले भी ली जाती हैं तो वे फाइलों के गट्ठर में ही दबकर रह जाती हैं।

अधिनियम के अनुसार देखें, तो विभाग के अधिकारीयों द्वारा ही जन-सुनवाई की जाती है। तो ऐसे में शिकायतों को न्यायसंगत तरीके से निपटारे की उम्मीद न के बराबर ही रह जाती है तथा इनमें दंड की बात की जाए तो वो भी व्यवहारिक तौर पर देखने को नहीं मिलता। 

‘जवाबदेही कानून’ की मांग में स्वतंत्र इकाई के निर्माण की बात की गयी है ताकि न्यायसंगत तरीके से शिकायतों का निवारण हो सके। इससे प्रशासन की जवाबदेहिता तो तय होगी ही, साथ ही शिकायत निवारण प्रक्रिया में नागरिक भागीदारी को भी मजबूती प्रदान होगी।      


संपादकीय इनपुट – राम रतन और सिद्धार्थ संतोष

Improving Public Outreach of Lokayukta

A lot has happened in Karnataka regarding the situation of corruption since I wrote my last blog a month back. A big scandal was unearthed in the recruitment of Police Sub Inspectors. The Additional Director General of Police, a senior officer, was arrested by the Anti-corruption bureau. In a few days, a former Deputy Commissioner of Bengaluru Urban District, a senior IAS officer, was also arrested based on allegations of corruption. This led to plenty of political conversation and discussion in the media. 

I watched the happenings with interest, but I was cynical. On a TV show, as a panelist, I could not help remarking that the ruling party’s riposte, against the allegations that they were in cahoots with the suspended officers, was not one of denial. All they said to the opposition was that they too were corrupt. A response that hardly instils a feeling of confidence in the concerned public.

There are two points of interest here concerning these developments. First, the issue hardly excited any public comment or concern. Matters quickly quietened down, and the issue disappeared from the headlines. There was nothing more than a few comments from civil society leaders, but otherwise, the issue seemed like something that the public had come to accept.

Most important, the arrest of such high officials, in other circumstances, would have put the government in the dock. However, that was hardly the case; the issue, I suspect, will not have any impact on voting behaviour in the elections just around the corner. 

The second point is that the Lokayukta or a discussion on the effectiveness of the institution was completely missing in the debate. That was to be expected, because of the marginalisation of the post in Karnataka; it has been vacant for the past three months after the previous incumbent retired. Police officials posted with the Lokayukta have been removed, and the institution is more or less in suspended animation.

Thus it is, at least from the experience of Karnataka, not a good time to discuss how the Lokayukta could improve public outreach. 

Yet, as I said in my previous blog, to reach out and gain public support and public confidence, the best way is for the Lokayukta to be public-facing

From experience, the simple way for the Lokayukta to reach out to the public has been through field inspections, public meetings, discussions, and seminars. About two decades back, a Lokayukta began the practice of surprise inspections of government offices. This hit the headlines and was widely appreciated by the public. However, things quickly turned sour. 

First, the bureaucracy did not like this approach at all. Second, the Lokayukta himself succumbed to the temptation of playing to the gallery, berating officers, sometimes even blameless ones, in public, and coming to rather simplistic conclusions regarding how corruption happens in some frontline offices of the government. Third, the actual follow-up action to these surprise inspections did not go beyond a few impulsive punitive measures.

Also, most recommendations from the Lokayukta to the government languished, including proposals for changes in the law to make the institution more effective. Even honest officers began to side with the corrupt, their allegiance to the institution of the bureaucracy taking precedence over their avowed support for honesty. 

Other Lokayuktas, too, have gone to press, given public speeches, and attended seminars. Sadly, it must be said that other than the emotional lamentation that things are getting worse, there has been little of substance on how to reduce corruption, department by department, that the Lokayukta has recommended.

While the problem statement gets elaborated and described from every angle, little has been suggested in terms of changes in structures and processes to make it difficult for the corrupt to play their games. 

So, in the light of these experiences, what are the best ways for a Lokayukta to reach out? In my view, four approaches may be effective.

First, site visits are important, but they must not become occasions for berating officials or attempting to do dramatic things. The public love a spectacle; so it will be difficult for a Lokayukta not to do something dramatic now and then. But the first visits to departments must be more contained, deeper, and leave time for a specific inquiry into each process that is being undertaken within that office. Ordering performance audits of the department concerned in advance may not be a bad idea.

Second, public outreach must not be in a general direction. The main users of the system today are those undertaking commercial activity or those who are students. Speaking to a general audience often becomes a chat to an audience that can find the time to attend a chat. That leads to an ‘o tempora, o mores!’ style of lamentation, which does not lead anywhere. So, a Lokayukta will need to plan focused outreach programmes.

Visits to colleges, universities, interest groups such as Chambers of commerce, contractors associations, builders, and architects, and any group that deals commercially with, or is vitally concerned with government regulation in the course of their commerce, is a potentially effective audience

Third, collaborations must be built. The Lokayukta needs to reach out to government departments and not alienate them by attacking their frontline officials. The latter are often blameless; the source of the incentives to turn corrupt lies elsewhere, amongst those who are up the ladder and powerful and influential. They must be befriended and the squeeze has to be applied there by an iron hand in a velvet glove.

In addition, other bodies can play a vital role in controlling corruption. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) is the body tasked with the formal conduct of an audit. Why cannot the Lokayukta and the CAG collaborate, even informally, while audit programmes are designed and carried out? Why cannot the Lokayukta be represented on audit advisory committees, constituted by the latter, to guide their officers who conduct audits?

Fourth, social media has to be harnessed in the fight against corruption. Most people who have to face corruption daily do not have the time to spare to learn more about their condition and how they can resist demands for bribes. Social media is the best way to reach out to them. A professionally designed and rolled-out plan for social media must be part of the armoury of any good Lokayukta.

Are these changes possible? In the light of the current happenings in Karnataka, they seem to be far-fetched. But who knows how quickly things may change. Suffice to say that despite the evidence that shows that anti-corruption commissions are not effective, there are ways and means by which their current, abysmal performance could be improved. 


To reach out and gain public support and public confidence, the best way is for the Lokayukta to be public-facing.


T.R. Raghunandan is an Advisor at the Accountability Initiative. 


Read all blogs on Anti-Corruption Commission by T. R. Raghunandan: 

    1. The Karnataka Lokayukta and the Dilution of Accountability
    2. Are Anti-Corruption Commissions Effective?
    3. How to have a Proactive Lokayukta

Decline in Unemployment Rate in 2020-21: A Reason to Rejoice or Worry?

The newly-released Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), 2020-21 documents an important employment trend. During the one-year period between July 2020 (3 months after the first COVID-19 wave hit the economy), and June 2021 (when the economy started reopening after the second wave of the pandemic), India’s unemployment rate registered a decline as compared to the same period in the previous year (July 2019 to June 2020). Were there actually more gainful employment opportunities generated in 2020-21? An analysis reveals that most people were taking up distress employment for sustenance, which is concerning.

The decline in unemployment came in comparison to an already difficult unemployment situation faced by the country in 2019-20. This welcome reduction documented in the PLFS  is a surprise as the employment woes brought on by the  pandemic are still very fresh. Starting from the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns in March 2020, economic activities across the country were severely hit, multiple times throughout 2020-21. This had a direct impact on India’s highly informal labour market.  

For instance, not only were there job losses, but also income-cuts for a considerable section of the workforce. According to monthly estimates published by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), unemployment rates touched very high numbers, ranging from 21.7 per cent in May 2020 to 11.8 per cent in May 2021. Once the nationwide lockdowns that began in 2020 were lifted, the economy rebounded. 

The overall unemployment rate, as per PLFS data, declined slightly from 4 per cent in 2019-20 to 3.3 per cent in 2020-21 in rural areas, and from 7 per cent to 6.7 per cent in urban areas (Figure 1). As a result, the worker population ratio (WPR) or the proportion of the population who were working, went up from 38.2 per cent to 39.8 per cent during this period. When disaggregated by gender, there was a higher percentage point increase in WPR for females which increased from 22 per cent to 24 per cent, as compared to that for males (54 per cent to 55 per cent).

Figure 1: Unemployment rate (in percentage points) considering usual principal and subsidiary status (UPSS), All India

Source: Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), Annual Report 2020-21, MoSPI, NSO, GoI.
Note: Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status’ (UPSS) considers workers according to both principal status (those working for a relatively long part of the 365 days preceding the date of survey, as well as subsidiary status or those persons from among the remaining population who had worked at least for 30 days during the reference period of 365 days preceding the date of survey).

The decrease in unemployment rate can be seen as a reason to rejoice as it is an indication that more people got the opportunity to enter the workforce during the one year that followed the first wave of the pandemic. 

But here’s the catch. 

A deeper look into the nature of employment reveals that there was actually a shift towards more precarious and informal types of work such as informal self-employment and unpaid work in family-based enterprises, than people engaging in sustainable and gainful employment. There was an overall increase in the share of own-account workers who operate by themselves, with or without business partners, and without hiring any labour. At the same time, the other vulnerable category that registered an increase in employment share was unpaid workers who helped in family-based enterprises, but did not receive any income for their work. 

While the share of casual labourers did not change much, those earning regular salaries came down substantially. This reflects a rise in the levels of informality and precariousness in India’s labour market in 2020-21 against the backdrop of a slight decline in unemployment rates. 
Moreover, the situation seems to have worsened for women. Even though women’s overall WPR went up, a large portion of them was engaged in precarious work causing significant vulnerability and uncertainties for sustained livelihoods. Among all women workers, the share of unpaid helpers in family-based enterprises rose from 35 per cent to 36.6 per cent (Figure 2). For women working without earning an individual income, there was obviously little scope of economic independence or empowerment. 

Similarly, the share of women who were self-employed and mostly worked on their own small family-based enterprises, went up as well. Even more worrisome, the proportion of women engaged in regular-salaried work, came down from 20 per cent to 17 per cent, which is a substantial drop of 3 percentage points within a year. This reflects a reduction in sustainable long-term employment during the period.

While there were shifts in the nature of work among males as well, they were less drastic, except for the fact that the share of regular-salaried workers among males also went down from 24 per cent in 2019-20 to 22.7 per cent in 2020-21.

Figure 2: Distribution of women workers across type of employment (in percentage points):
2019-20 vs. 2020-21

Source: Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), Annual Report 2020-21, MoSPI, NSO, GoI.

A look also at employment distribution across industries is informative. There was a slight decline in those engaged in the services sector, and a corresponding increase in agriculture and the manufacturing sector. For instance, women engaged in the service sector declined from 23.4 per cent in 2019-20 to 21.5 per cent in 2020-21. 

In the case of male workers, while there was a slight decline in the share of senior officials and professions, the overall occupational distribution for males did not change much. In contrast, among working women the proportion of ‘Legislators, senior officials and managers’ came down from 5.8 per cent to 5 per cent, and ‘Professionals’ declined from 4.2 per cent to 3.8 per cent. This indicates a decline in formal jobs with social security provisions. On the other hand, the share of ‘Skilled agricultural and fishery workers’  among women increased considerably from 41.3 per cent to 44.9 per cent. 

For workers engaged in the non-agriculture sector, the proportion employed in informal sector enterprises (comprising unincorporated enterprises owned by households i.e. proprietary and partnership enterprises including the informal producers’ cooperatives) increased from 69.5 per cent to 71.4 per cent as a whole. This shift was slightly more pronounced for males than for females in both rural and urban areas. 

Thus, while overall labour market indicators during 2020-21 do not paint a dismal picture compared to 2019-20, higher work participation seems to be the result of distress employment. Even though we will have to wait for another year to access official employment data for 2021-22 from PLFS, the recent monthly data available from CMIE has already indicated that the situation has taken a downturn again between July 2021 and now. 

As per CMIE, there has been a massive fall in total employment of around 13 million in June 2022 compared to May 2022, leading to the overall size of employment touching one of the lowest during the last one year. This is primarily because of a decline in rural agricultural labourers on the back of a sluggish monsoon, followed by a loss of salaried jobs. This is a clear indication of the temporary nature of employment gain in 2020-21 and a continuation of the uncertainties of India’s highly informal labour market.


Mridusmita Bordoloi is an Associate Fellow at Accountability Initiative. 


Also Read: Social Protection to Safeguard Citizens against Vulnerabilities 

‘People Think that Anganwadis are Withholding their Benefits’

The ‘Inside Districts’ series launched in April 2020 is a one-of-its-kind attempt to capture the experiences of district and Block-level officials, Panchayat functionaries, beneficiaries, and frontline workers, on their challenges and best practices.

This interview was conducted with a Lady Supervisor in Bihar in Hindi on 7 May 2022, and has been translated.


Q. Are parents sending their children to the Anganwadi Centres (AWCs)? What kind of challenges are you facing in this regard?

Lady Supervisor (LS): Yes, but before the pandemic, there was a routine that the parents would themselves get the children ready and send them to the centre. Now, we have to go to a child’s house two to three times to call them to the centre. Things are a bit difficult because of the discontinuity over the last two years.

Q. Do you see a change in the malnutrition status in children? What all is being given to children as nutritious food?

LS: The malnutrition situation is the same as it was earlier, because we were able to provide services to only half of the children.

Even when we recommend sending severely malnourished children to the Nutritional Rehabilitation Centre (NRC), their parents do not agree. Most of these parents have five to seven children, they don’t want to leave them to go stay at NRC.

We are serving dal (lentils), rice and soybeans as nutritious food.

Q. According to you, during the COVID-19 pandemic, were there things which the government should have provided but did not? On the other hand, what necessary things have been provided?

LS: We should have received more safety masks, sanitisers, and PPE kits from the government. But all we received from the department was a single mask, what good would that have done? I had to ensure all safety measures with my own money before going to work.

We only receive honorarium from the government, and now we do not even expect anything else from the government.

Q. What are your primary responsibilities at the moment? What challenges are you facing in their regard?

LS: Ensuring that community-based events like Godbharai and Annaprashan take place every month, among other things.

As for challenges — there are 12 AWCs in my sector, but they are incomplete. As per an order of the District Magistrate, we have to run classes for the children within the centres.

Also, for a population of over a thousand people, we receive Take Home Ration (THR) for only 40 to 45 children, as per the norms. But when Village Health, Sanitation and Nutrition Days (VHSNDs) happen, the people who do not get THR also do not come for vaccination! We have to explain to them that THR and vaccinations are two separate things, and that vaccination is very important for both them and their children.

Q. Is Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) taking place at the AWC? What instructions have you received regarding ECCE?

LS: Yes, we have received materials for ECCE and activities for the same are being carried out. But the AWWs do not use the material themselves. It is only when I go to the centre and ask them to, that they take out the material and give it to the children.

Apart from this, the centre has been tagged with a school.

Q. During the last six months, what kind of problems have Anganwadi Workers (AWWs) brought to your notice?

LS: Their biggest challenge is filling the Poshan tracker [which tracks key nutrition parameters among children, girls, and pregnant and lactating women]. Many of them have not studied much, and usually the update on the tracker is done by one of their family members, like their son or daughter. Another challenge they face is that the beneficiaries do not want to come for vaccinations.

Q. Have you received any complaints regarding service delivery from the beneficiaries in the last two years? Conversely, have you received such complaints from AWWs?

LS: Yes, when we used to receive a supply of hot food for 20 instead of 40 children or money for only half of the lactating mothers who are beneficiaries, many people used to think that the AWWs were withholding the benefits. We had to explain that the benefits were not available for everyone at the moment.

Even now, when children between ages 3-6 years are served hot-cooked food, they ask for the dry Take Home Ration (THR) along with it. According to them, since they used to get it earlier, they would still get it. There is only so much AWWs can do at their end, for example, they can feed two or three extra kids from the supply they get for say the 40 children under the AWC. But they can’t provide more than they receive.

Even when AWWs bring these complaints to us, we explain to them the same thing! Sometimes they understand, other times they don’t. In such situations I contact the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO).


More experiences can be found on the dedicated Inside Districts platform.

सरकारी प्रक्रियाओं की समझ ज़रूरी है

‘हम और हमारी सरकार’ कोर्स एक ऐसा कोर्स है, जो बताता है कि आख़िर सरकार के तीनों स्तर यानी केंद्र, राज्य एवं स्थानीय स्तर किस तरह से कार्य करते हैं तथा किस तरह से सरकार का पूरा सिस्टम एकसाथ काम करता है।

पिछले कुछ सालों से हम शासन-प्रशासन से जुड़ी महत्वपूर्ण जानकारियों को अलग-अलग राज्यों में कार्य कर रही विभिन्न  संस्थाओं के साथ साझा करते आ रहे हैं। इस तरह से हमारा एक बड़ा परिवार बन चूका है जहाँ हमें भी बहुत सी संस्थाओं के बहुआयामी साथियों के साथ मिलने का अवसर मिला। ऐसे साथी जो चाहते हैं कि सिस्टम में बदलाव आये, जो चाहते हैं कि सरकार द्वारा चलाई जा रही विभिन्न योजनाओं का लाभ जल्द से जल्द उनके मूल लाभार्थियों तक पहुंचे।

इस कोर्स से अलग-अलग राज्यों में सफलता की कई कहानियां निकलकर आई हैं। ऐसी ही एक कहानी हम आपके साथ साझा करना चाहते हैं।

सरिता देवी  बिहार की रहने वाली हैं और वह पिछले 5 सालों से जनप्रतिनिधि के रूप में अपने गाँव में सेवाएं देती आ रही हैं। सरिता अपने गाँव की वार्ड सदस्या हैं और साथ ही वह एक संस्था के साथ भी जुड़ी हुई हैं जो बिहार में पंचायतों के साथ मिलकर जनप्रतिनिधियों के कौशल विकास तथा सामाजिक सुरक्षा पर कार्य करती है। 

सरिता जिस गाँव से आती हैं वह शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, सड़क, पानी इत्यादि क्षेत्रों में काफी पिछड़ा हुआ है । इसलिए सरिता चाहती थीं कि वह किसी तरह अपने गाँव का विकास कर पाए। वह निरंतरअपनी पंचायत के मुखिया और पंचायत सचिव से बातचीत करती रहती थी ताकि उनके सहयोग से गाँव में विकास होवह बार–बार अपनी पंचायत से अनेकों सवाल करती थीं, जैसे कि

“पंचायत में जो सरकार के द्वारा पैसा भेजा जाता है उसका क्या हो रहा है, तथा उस पैसे से मेरे गाँव की समस्या क्यों दूर नहीं हो रही है? बिहार में  जो सात निश्चय कार्यक्रम हमारे मुख्यमंत्री द्वारा चलाया जा रहा है, जिसमें हम सुने हैं कि काफी पैसा पंचायत को दिया गया है तो  हमारी पंचायत में कोई भी विकास कार्य क्यों  नहीं हो रहे हैं?” 

इस तरह के कई सवाल सरिता मुखिया और पंचायत सचिव से पूछा करती थी और हमेशा जवाब यही मिलता था की पंचायत में पैसा बहुत कम आता है जिसके कारण गाँव का विकास संभव नहीं है।

एक दिन की बात है, सरिता जिस संस्था से जुड़कर काम कर रही थीं, उसके जिला समन्वयक ने उन्हें हम और हमारी सरकार’ कोर्स में जाने का निमंत्रण दिया। सरिता ने इसे स्वीकार किया और यह कोर्स पटना में जाकर किया। कोर्स में इन्हें काफी महत्वपूर्ण चीजें बतायी गयीं जैसे सरकार कैसे चलती है, सरकार में कौन क्या कार्य करता है, सरकार की वितीय व्यवस्था किस तरह से चलती है यानी केंद्र व राज्य से पैसा किस तरह से नीचे स्थानीय स्तर पर पहुँचता है इत्यादि। 

कोर्स के माध्यम से यह जानकारी मिलने के बाद सरिता ने सोचा कि क्यों न अब इसका इस्तेमाल अपनी पंचायत में जाकर किया जाए। अब वह मुखिया और पंचायत सचिव से जवाब मांगते समय इस बात पर ज़ोर डालने लगीं की उन्हें मालूम है की सरकार का पैसा किस तरह से पंचायतों के पास आता है और कहाँ-कहाँ से आता है। वह अपनी पंचायत में आने वाले तथा खर्च किये पैसे का हिसाब मांगने लगी।

मुखिया और पंचायत सचिव शुरू ने शुरू में थोड़ा बहुत आनाकानी कि लेकिन वह जल्द ही समझ गए की सरिता को सरकारी प्रक्रियाओं की पक्की समझ हो चुकी है और अब पंचायत किसी भी जानकारी को केवल अपने तक ही सीमित नहीं रख सकती। आज सरिता द्वारा उठाये गए मुद्दों के कारण उनके गाँव में विकास हो रहा है। अब पंचायत में भी इस तरह का माहौल बनना शुरू हो चुका है जहाँ मुखिया और पंचायत सचिव अब पंचायत के हर पैसा का हिसाब देते हैं।

यह कहानी आपसे साझा करने का मकसद बस यही था कि चाहे हम विभिन्न संस्थाओं में अपनी सेवायें दे रहे कार्यकर्ता हों, छात्र हों या फिर पंचायती राज संस्थाओं के प्रतिनिधि, हमें पहले यह सुनिश्चित करना होगा की हम सरकार और उसके तंत्र को भली-भांति समझ लें। जब हमारा ज्ञान और क्षमता बढ़ेगी तो निःसंदेह हम सेवा वितरण को और  बेहतर करने में  सक्षम हो पाएंगे। 


उदय शंकर एकाउंटेबिलिटी इनिशिटिव में वरिष्ठ पैसा एसोसिएट के पद पर कार्यरत हैं |


आगे पढ़ें: भारत में गैर-सरकारी संस्थाओं की भूमिका अहम क्यों हैं?

Decrease in Funds for MGNREGS Amidst Increasing Rural Unemployment

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), India’s flagship programme on rural livelihoods, witnessed neither a mention in the Budget speech for FY 2022-23 nor an increase in the budget allocations despite a staggeringly high unemployment rate in the last two years. Meanwhile, unemployment is on the rise as the pandemic continues. Given the relevance of MGNREGS as a social safety net in rural India, the reduced allocation to the scheme may prove disadvantageous. 

As economic opportunities plummeted due to the COVID-19 induced slowdown, the unemployment rate in India skyrocketed to 10.35 per cent in calendar year(CY) 2020 and 7.8 per cent in CY 2021, as compared to 4.5 per cent in CY 2017. Inevitably, many people were forced to look for alternative sources of income and flocked to access MGNREGS, which guarantees at least 100 days of wage employment in a Financial Year (FY) to every rural household that demands work. 

Thereby, the work demanded under the scheme soared from 6.2 crore households in FY 2019-20 to 8.6 crore households in FY 2020-21 and 8.1 crore households  in FY 2021-22. While employment provided has also increased, there exists significant unmet demand (the difference between employment demanded and provided) with 79.6 lakh households not getting work despite demanding it in FY 2021-22.

Using the unemployment data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) for FY 2021-22, we see that peak unemployment was observed in May 2021, at 11.8 per cent. The increased employment provided from MGNREGS for the same period, in comparison, however, was minimal, rising from 79 per cent employment provided-to-demanded in April 2021 to 80 per cent employment provided-to-demanded in May 2021. Following that, employment provided by MGNREGS remained more or less stable at  around 76 per cent, with a small dip witnessed in November 2021.


Source: MGNREGS MIS, CMIE Unemployment Data.

A state-wise analysis is also revealing. 

Looking particularly at May 2021 (when the unemployment rate was the highest), Assam had a moderate proportion of employment provided to employment demanded under MGNREGS (82 per cent), given its unemployment rate was 0 per cent. On the other hand, Haryana’s unemployment rate was at 29 per cent, whereas the proportion of employment provided-to-demanded under MGNREGS  was 80 per cent. Telangana had the highest employment provided-to-demanded at 106 per cent with a moderate unemployment rate of 7 per cent. 

In contrast, Rajasthan, which saw a high unemployment rate of 28 per cent, had the smallest proportion of employment provided-to-demanded under MGNREGS at just 64 per cent.


Source: MGNREGS MIS (1) (2), CMIE Unemployment Data

Looking at state-wise comparison of average employment provided under MGNREGS  for FY 2021-22 to the average unemployment rate for the year, Haryana and Rajasthan showcased the highest unemployment rate at 29 per cent and 25 per cent, respectively. This trend extends on what was observed in May. In contrast, Meghalaya and Gujarat had the lowest unemployment rate at 2 per cent each. While Rajasthan managed to have a high proportion of work demand met by MGNREGS at 93 per cent, Haryana had significant unmet demand. Telangana, on the other hand, had the highest employment provided by MGNREGS, whereas Gujarat had the lowest employment provided-to-demanded under MGNREGS.


Source: MGNREGS MIS (1) (2), CMIE Unemployment Data.

The trend of employment generated is greatly influenced by the amount of funds received by states under the scheme, and there is a huge variation in the amount sanctioned to each state. For instance, at the end of FY 2021-22, Karnataka and Maharashtra were sanctioned the most funds under the scheme at Rs. 13,88,429 lakh and Rs. 10,87,551 lakh respectively. Mizoram and Goa were sanctioned the least funds at Rs. 59,065 lakh  and Rs. 10,505 lakh respectively. 


Source: Population figures from Census 2011. Amount Sanctioned figures from MGNREGS MIS.

Focusing on larger states, as  categorised by the NITI Aayog, in per capita terms, Karnataka and Maharashtra were sanctioned the highest funds per capita under the scheme at Rs. 3,706 and Rs. 1,767 respectively. Given the high sanctioned funds, Karnataka also displayed a low average unemployment rate of 3 per cent and a high proportion of employment provided-to-demanded of 92 per cent. Similarly, Maharashtra had a low average unemployment rate of 5 per cent and a high proportion of employment provided-to-demanded of 90 per cent. 

Haryana, on the other hand,  was sanctioned the least amount of funds under MGNREGS at just Rs. 15 per capita. Haryana also reported a very high average unemployment rate of 29 per cent and a moderate proportion of employment provided-to-demanded under MGNREGS of 85 per cent. 

Thus, low funds sanctioned in FY 2021-22 affected the state’s ability to provide employment under MGNREGS. Increased funds would allow better access to the scheme and decreased proportion of unmet demand.

In this context, then, it was expected that the budget allocation for the scheme in FY 2022-23, would be cognizant of the significance of this social safety net. However,  for the current FY, GoI allocated Rs. 73,000 crore to MGNREGS. This was the same as the BEs for FY 2021-22, but 26 per cent lower than the previous year’s REs.


Source: Union Expenditure Budget, MoRD for FY 2016-17 to FY 2022-23. Note: Figures in crores of Rupees and are Revised Estimates (REs) except for FY 2022-23, which are Budget Estimates (BEs). 

Despite its limitations, the scheme has proven to be the most crucial combating force against the COVID-19 pandemic-induced unemployment. An increase in the scheme’s allocated budget would have allowed for better performance in the current financial year. Unfortunately, the  reduction in the budget  will only lead to a further increase in unmet demand under MGNREGS and low access to the world’s largest social security scheme.


Ria Kasliwal and Jenny Susan John are Research Associates at Accountability Initiative.


Also Read: In a Glance: MGNREGS Wages